Is affirming the antecedent valid?

Is affirming the antecedent valid?

A conditional statement does not assert either the antecedent or the consequent. It simply claims that if the antecedent is true, then the consequent is also true. Although affirming the consequent is an invalid argument form and sometimes mistaken for, the valid argument form modus ponens.

How do you justify your reasoning?

That means to tell your reason or answer and tell someone why its right. And to do something to tell that your answer is right and justify that your own reason is right. You do that when you think your answer is right and tell it to a person that has a different answer or does not know the answer.

How do you justify an answer in English?

Justify. With ‘justify’ question words, you need to explain the basis of your argument by presenting the evidence that informed your outlook. In such answers, you need to present your evidence in a convincing way, demonstrating good reasons for adopting your position.

Can an argument be valid and false?

TRUE: A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.

How can I justify my study?

The legitimacy of the research justification can be established in a number of ways:

  1. provide references;
  2. refer to a policy, press report, or other reputable information source;
  3. provide a detailed outline of a context, condition, concern, conundrum or situation;
  4. provide an anecdote or evidence from personal experience.

What did you feel or how did you feel?

“How does it feel” It’s in the present/ recent past. The question “What did you feel?” is asking what was felt physically, by touch. Asking “How did you feel?” is asking what emotion someone felt, not physically, here is an example: Person A: How did you feel? Person B: I felt happy.

Can a single argument both justify and also explain its conclusion?

The very same claims show both that the conclusion is true and why it is true. The same passage constitutes both argument (justification) and explanation, just as Thomas maintained. This can happen because the justifying premises are also statements that are appropriate to explain the fact that is in the conclusion.

Is affirming the consequent a valid argument form?

Affirming the consequent is a valid argument form. An argument of this form—If p, then q; p; therefore, q—is called modus ponens. An argument of this form—If p, then q; not p; therefore, not q—is called modus tollens. This argument form known as modus tollens is valid.

How do you justify an idea?

Proper research is essential to building your case.

  1. State Your Claim. A strong justification narrative begins with a brief statement of your claim, which will be the focus of your piece.
  2. Establish Reasons. Once you state your claim, begin providing the reasoning.
  3. Provide Support.
  4. Discuss Budgetary Issues.

What is a valid argument form?

An argument form is valid if, no matter what particular statements are substituted for the statement variables in its premises, whenever the resulting premises are all true, the conclusion is also true.